Sorry binnie, I just wish to clarify one point - the post from GX in the owners' group wasn't quite to seek help from the group, at least this is how I see it. It was a question meant for me, directly. The question was addressed only to me.
Seeing that it was a question meant for me, I responded. Ok, sorry, I should have responded in a more sensitive manner, and while the response was factual it could appear curt. I can learn a thing or two from this.
There have been occasions where members posted there to seek help from the other members, and members were helpful.
Thanks.
QUOTE=binnie;105994699]GX, we know each other and you should know I'm quite objective and I'm not taking sides. I'm also not some random clone. I think there are 2 main issues here.
1. You sought help from the GG FB group. Nothing wrong with doing that. Could the boss have handled the enquiry on FB / sales support email better? I'm sure most would say yes (the FB reply sounded abit curt and the email felt passive aggressive). Nevertheless, the boss came out and acknowledged that he could have handled the situation more delicately and that he'll be more careful in the future. Sure,maybe he doesn't want the backlash of negative feedback to stain the "brand". But at last, he did the right thing anyway.
2. When someone enquired about the watch, you stated "Watch condition perfect". Let's be mature and apply some common sense to this la. "watch" refers to the watch as a whole, not just the case. It's knn obviously not perfect. Just be upfront and state the known defects la. What for waste your time and the potential buyer's time if you know the buyer may not buy it if he knows about the stain. Be upfront and don't withhold information la.[/QUOTE]