Haha ok la for 5k u getting a good brand, a good watch, good packaging and in my opinion good value hahha
while ownself song can liao, it's good to equip ourselves with the good knowledge and history to appreciate watches better and in the proper context - and not be an unwitting carrot to heartless marketing.
my omega 2254.50 does not pretend to be the 60s british navy mil-spec omega seamaster 300 like what watchco tries to do with varying levels of QC, although the dial design cues from it are so strong and unmistakable.
/trollmode ON
the omega 2254.50 may not have the fantasy of the moonwatch, but gawd dammit! it's 300m water resistance sure beats the paltry 50m of the "moonwatch", not to mention a sleeker clasp.
the "moonwatch" is a watch that:
- does not hack
- is not an automatic
- needs the tiresome chore of daily winding
- has weak-ass lume
- instead of a more useful date function, it has a relatively "useless" stopwatch function that any cheap $10 casio can do better down to 1/100th of a second. and the excuse to use a multiple thousand dollar watch to "time cooking a soft boil egg" is simply so damn LAME!
the only thing going for it is a pretty face.
on the other hand, my omega 2254.50 being oop with a strong cult following means its rising value is assured.

unlike more expensive copies of the "moonwatch" that did not actually went to the moon, and isn't even in the correct configuration using the original column wheel cal 321.
/trollmode OFF
ok, have i done enough to stir "moonwatch" lovers? am i feeling the hate?! c'mon, bring IT on!
