sfugel
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2009
- Messages
- 18,613
- Reaction score
- 3,322
Well, I think safety first. Others may not. But I take road safety anytime.And increase travelling time as well as waiting time and also cause more jam.
Well, I think safety first. Others may not. But I take road safety anytime.And increase travelling time as well as waiting time and also cause more jam.
Safety is turning when clear, not risking when can't see clear. Stairs also can cause falls and injury but I don't see HDB put mattresses at the steps or bottom of the steps to prevent hurt.Well, I think safety first. Others may not. But I take road safety anytime.
Road safety first for me.Safety is turning when clear, not risking when can't see clear. Stairs also can cause falls and injury but I don't see HDB put mattresses at the steps or bottom of the steps to prevent hurt.
Without the discretionary turn, when there is 0 oncoming traffic, it adds to unnecessary build up from the other direction. Thanks to the removal, I have to wait at the junction for additional 3-5 minutes where there is no oncoming traffic before turning.
Road safety is to stay off the road. If road safety matters, then limit all cars to go no more than 25km/h and no right turns only left. Make 4 left turns to get right.Road safety first for me.
The discretionary right turn at BreadTalk building towards kpe is dangerous. The curvature of the road result in drivers not able to see far. Wonder when is LTA going to remove it.Sounds like his fault too. Turning when knowing well that theres a car coming from the front. That's why I wish they will remove theses discretionary right turn and put a green arrow.
Well, you have your opinion I have mine. Road Safety First. All lives matter. Save minutes, lose life or be patient and save life.Road safety is to stay off the road. If road safety matters, then limit all cars to go no more than 25km/h and no right turns only left. Make 4 left turns to get right.
Skewed logic. Safety first then don't even drive or leave house. One can use common sense to do discretionary right turn and save time and save life.Well, you have your opinion I have mine. Road Safety First. All lives matter. Save minutes, lose life or be patient and save life.
Let's agree to disagree. You have your opinion and I respect that. Ohhhh btw I will still be driving and highly like been driving much longer than you have.Skewed logic. Safety first then don't even drive or leave house. One can use common sense to do discretionary right turn and save time and save life.
Likely don't even drive to even make such a suggestion.
So if you’re waiting at a discretionary right turn junction, waiting to turn right … no incoming traffic at all … actually .. no cars, no pedestrians at all … you’ll still wait for that green arrow to come on?Well, you have your opinion I have mine. Road Safety First. All lives matter. Save minutes, lose life or be patient and save life.

This scenario compared to the one hitting your rear (straight) is totally different broI was turning right at a discretionary right turn and the vehicle from the front sped and hit my rear while I was almost 80% completed my turn
Not ur fault y need to pay?hi all, got into a bad accident while on a getgo car and a taxi driver crashed onto the back of my car. Can I ask whats the max damage payment if i never opt into CDW? I saw the website the excess fee is 10.8k, is that the max i have to pay? and will i get my license revoked? Thanks in advance
Just prepare at most 10.8k gone. Don't need to think too much. You won't win 100% of this case since you are partially at fault for not checking clear and safe before doing the right turn.
Driving longer than somebody doesn't mean that they have logical thinking. Kia si thinking doesn't count.Let's agree to disagree. You have your opinion and I respect that. Ohhhh btw I will still be driving and highly like been driving much longer than you have.
If you are in the shoes of the taxi driver, your story would be different:Depends on the road as well. On my regular route, there is a junction allowing U-turn/right-turn but the road ahead has a curve. So when starting the U-turn, it can look clear, then some chiongster can come racing out of the curve. So if he has car cam showing it was clear when he started his turn then maybe will be fully on the other car especially since coming to junction should slow down.
If you are in the shoes of the taxi driver, your story would be different:
So this bugger starts turning and unfortunately you hit his left-rear and somehow you become liable for some damages? I think you would find this unacceptable.
- You clearly have the right-of-way with green light going straight
- The opposite right-turning lane is discretionary
If you are in the shoes of a 'chiongster', then yes perhaps you do bear some liability.
The onus is on TS to make sure the incoming traffic is clear before starting the turn. If TS is unsure, just wait, it is that simple. If you get horned and you start turning and you hit another vehicle or get hit, the car(s) that horned you are not going to pay for your damages anyway.
We won't know the full story about this particular incident but yes, the best we can do is slam the brakes and pray hard you don't hit the turning car and not get hit at your back too.I hope I never have to be in the shoes of the taxi driver. Personally, I don't care if I have the right of way. if I am clearly at risk of hitting the other car going the same speed I am, I will rather hit the brakes if safe and let him go ahead first. Similarly if I cannot be sure the other car is going to stop at the stop line and give way, I am going to be prepared to slow/stop. No point having the right of way and ownself suffer in the crash.