Not looking up on blue bin issueSource: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/sin...er-centre-kf-seetoh-baskets-free-food-5290671
Once again, never directly provided the main clarifications on the main point(s) that people are seeking on.
https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/20...ms-over-storage-fee-and-charity-meal-clauses/
Continued disagreement over principle
While the Canopy Hawkers Group’s explanation directly addressed the storage fee claims, it did not resolve the disagreement with Seetoh.
The operator drew a clear distinction between charging for permanent fixtures and charging for temporary deliveries, whereas Seetoh’s concern lay in the fact that the space — regardless of its purpose — was tied to a charge in the example he cited.
Similarly, on the free meal clause, the group and Minister Ong both highlighted the voluntary and unenforced nature of the scheme, while Seetoh argued that the very presence of such a clause created unnecessary pressure and potential for future enforcement.
But charity meals issue is clear
IT SHOULD NOT be in contract
So is it now EMPHATICALLY even if never provide, there's zero action taken against the hawkers?
If so, all hawker should point blank tell the operator and all public NO charity meals
Last edited:
