WussRedXLi
Greater Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2001
- Messages
- 89,130
- Reaction score
- 9,560
BTW this is a non-WOKE vid......so be advised.
Last edited:
Well true also....i forgot abt that.
Im also doing the hamgstring curls (w bands) and bicep curls. And the glute med and TFL and psoas group with resistance band raises. And of coz calf and tib raises. And shrugs. I used to do lateram arm side raises as well but since i think got interferece with my weighted dips, i stopped those. Esp coz now i am doing the Mike Mentzer style (i eased a bit to fail towards the 12 rep range liao with 1 single working set, as far as resistance is concerned)
Compound exercises would be all the usual fun stuff.
Cycling is fun lah.....so many things to faff and play around also. just need to do the strengthening and i dare say solid strengthening that's more towards body/powerlifting levels than just general strengthening.
CCP5 starts too early and too far from my house, if not i think i will join maybe early next year. I use Sava bike can liao. But safety really a concern still, esp with how they beat the lights. Maybe partial join lah, to gauge my fitness/power. Maybe join at WCH area for 5km....heh.
Beat red lights still join ah?
Join @ WCH, no lights there. That's why i mentioned WCH.
Ride safe.
Do u know your ftp w/kg? If 3.5 and above u are already very good.
HR is 96 BPM, at 5:27 min/km. Anyway, I still think a good wrist base HR on the watch is pretty good for average HR, if you look at laps or overall runs. Still useful for post run analysis. But not instantaneous one off reading like looking for Max HR. Look at the regression plot from The Quantified Scientist channel on his review on all optical base HR, and see why.
Your Apple Watch has the best optical wrist base HRM according to the Quantified Scientist channel . so is the Huawei Watches. Same experience with steady state HR training, wrist base HR is pretty alright to agar agar not to crossed a certain ceiling BPM. I think the people who question him about 170bpm for easy runs, are new runners who don't have a proper LT1 or LT2.I don't fully agree with what he says. imho what he says only applies for himself.
My apple watch wrist hr sensor is on par with both coros hr monitor worn on the arm and a Polar H10 worn on chest for runs from easy to tempo runs. For my use case, wrist HR sensor only falls behind for intervals or max effort when the hand swings gets extreme. Between the coros and polar, the coros armband HR has a 2-3 secs lag . And I perspire by the boatloads! Personally tested all 3 extensively as I train almost exclusively via HR in the past.
So i just use apple watch for easy/tempo and long runs. Coros hr monitor for workouts. Polar H10 don't get much use nowsaday as the coros is much more comfortable to wear.
if 170bpm is easy run then that runner should be beginner... just need to run more. any run is an anaerobic effort cos no aerobic base to speak off.Your Apple Watch has the best optical wrist base HRM according to the Quantified Scientist channel . so is the Huawei Watches. Same experience with steady state HR training, wrist base HR is pretty alright to agar agar not to crossed a certain ceiling BPM. I think the people who question him about 170bpm for easy runs, are new runners who don't have a proper LT1 or LT2.
Personally i use arm band Polar OH1 for long runs, for long duration comfort. All others I use chest strap Garmin Dual HRM. But my target intensity is pace based according to my AI trainer. So HR are just for data collection for the AI to calculate my training loads and form and for myself if I want to deem my run as harder than usual so I can cut short and DNF the training.
170bpm is easy to run when one is young, eg. in teens and early 20s and some in their 30s. Anaerobic effort can push to max and recover fast. With proper training and good fitness base, some in their 40s will feel 170bpm is not too taxing as well. As one grows older, it will naturally drop. now i am in my 50s, i no longer dare to push too hard (die is ok but not half dead and become a liability to ppl around me). HR max usually around mid 170s with occassional low 180s.if 170bpm is easy run then that runner should be beginner... just need to run more. any run is an anaerobic effort cos no aerobic base to speak off.
speaking for HR.. you guys notice your MAX hr dropping as you age?.. when I started running few years back it was like 182... then... this year the max i have seen is 179 and it is a confirmed max effort hr during tt
I wear my apple watch and coros watch + hr sensor whenever i run. comparing my Apple Watch and Coros HR sensor (bicep band), they are quite close (most of the time, +/-1)Your Apple Watch has the best optical wrist base HRM according to the Quantified Scientist channel . so is the Huawei Watches. Same experience with steady state HR training, wrist base HR is pretty alright to agar agar not to crossed a certain ceiling BPM. I think the people who question him about 170bpm for easy runs, are new runners who don't have a proper LT1 or LT2.
Personally i use arm band Polar OH1 for long runs, for long duration comfort. All others I use chest strap Garmin Dual HRM. But my target intensity is pace based according to my AI trainer. So HR are just for data collection for the AI to calculate my training loads and form and for myself if I want to deem my run as harder than usual so I can cut short and DNF the training.
When did you joined the 50s club?170bpm is easy to run when one is young, eg. in teens and early 20s and some in their 30s. Anaerobic effort can push to max and recover fast. With proper training and good fitness base, some in their 40s will feel 170bpm is not too taxing as well. As one grows older, it will naturally drop. now i am in my 50s, i no longer dare to push too hard (die is ok but not half dead and become a liability to ppl around me). HR max usually around mid 170s with occassional low 180s.
I wear my apple watch and coros watch + hr sensor whenever i run. comparing my Apple Watch and Coros HR sensor (bicep band), they are quite close (most of the time, +/-1)
just this yrWhen did you joined the 50s club?
Max Hr, I never measured before, coz I haven't pushed myself hard enough.
I can only estimate from my estimated lthr which from my latest 10km race (real run) is 158 bpm there about. Assuming I have plateaued, lthr would be around 90% of max hr. So it's around 175 nia.
humm.. you mid-late 50s? if so 175 max hr is spot on for someone with a exercise regimentWhen did you joined the 50s club?
Max Hr, I never measured before, coz I haven't pushed myself hard enough.
I can only estimate from my estimated lthr which from my latest 10km race (real run) is 158 bpm there about. Assuming I have plateaued, lthr would be around 90% of max hr. So it's around 175 nia.
Tbh,your body is the best gauge. One should be able to tell the diff between a HR of 120-130 and 150-160.Your Apple Watch has the best optical wrist base HRM according to the Quantified Scientist channel . so is the Huawei Watches. Same experience with steady state HR training, wrist base HR is pretty alright to agar agar not to crossed a certain ceiling BPM. I think the people who question him about 170bpm for easy runs, are new runners who don't have a proper LT1 or LT2.
Personally i use arm band Polar OH1 for long runs, for long duration comfort. All others I use chest strap Garmin Dual HRM. But my target intensity is pace based according to my AI trainer. So HR are just for data collection for the AI to calculate my training loads and form and for myself if I want to deem my run as harder than usual so I can cut short and DNF the training.