
Don't say this, these hawker need location to do their business, they can't do street hawker like in other country. They want to survive they need the place, so they pretty much helpless as PAP set the limitation with these SEHCAgain, all these are bw terms hawkers sign with open eyes.
Now using social pressure to wriggle their way out.
You just need to read 1 line.
"It's not the hawkers duty to feed the poor and destitute. If you cannot afford a meal, please see your MP for help."
Seetoh and his band of merry hawkers are equally the capitalist your hated landlords are.
Don't expect them to drop their prices simply because they pay lower rents.
you go search see how many of these private enterprise is run by "Grassroots", relationships to MPs and even to ministers.Is there a list of govt officials who started such predatory "public good" schemes, benefited greatly from such predatory schemes, then safely exited such predatory schemes, leaving their predecessors to take the rap?
Or are currently in the midst of doing so?
Same for SMRT, taxpayer money to build the tracks and SMRT just operate and doing a terrible jobPAP gov is using taxpayers money to build all these hawker centers and then letting in private companies to raid all the profits - increasing cost on hawkers and ultimately increase prices for Singaporeans.
Rental do not directly impact food cost, as one ex minister once said.With this kind of operators... price of food dun go up then got ghosts ar...![]()
Amy khor really know how to use word salad....LOL this whole SEHC started with Amy Koh since 2018 . At that time, many MPs alredy raised questions regarding the viability of this hawker centre model and it's impact on livelihoods of the hawkers. Fast forward 7 yrs later and it seems like nothing much has improved...NEA better wake up !
https://www.straitstimes.com/politi...-socially-conscious-enterprise-hawker-centres
who managed timbre ?
is any MP involved in the group?
Maybe it's time to relook at whether MPs and Politicians can be directly involved in any company dealing with govt. If it is almost all, then so be it. You want your profits, you dont join politics.
From what I can find from NEA website and news article, it is likely correct.And we are supposed to take as truth what a person posted, when he was wrong just a week ago on a similar matter?
So many boon lay hawkers earn so much with sports car. Hawkers earns alot.At least his is a 100% private entity not funded anyway by taxpayers money.
All these nea hawkers are build and pay by gov and mgmt fee given out annually in tune of $5 million for the so call social enterprise to operate. All these beared by taxpayers. Thats the main difference.
Sinkies ... really clueless siah ..
I agree. This Edward Chia has been incredibly silent on this issue over the past few years. All he keep saying is he not part of the group anymore.If Edward chia has a social conscious, he should really step in and restructure the whole shet
You can say he has stepped down, but come on this is a livelihood that affects thousands who don't have bargaining power
Not all politicians are bad, they came out with this with good intentions but as the forest is decaying, time for rotten eggs to be picked and shamed
Xiasuay for our hawkers to have heritage value but exploit by bad sheep operators
Why GE never expose this ? Now too late alr la.