Caveat Emptor, Sony Xperia
Why the title Buyer's Beware? Here's a few points to ponder.
As with all the great gadgets in the world, the success of a product depends on several factors. Product, quality, and most importantly, Aftersales Services.
But Sony's Xperia Aftersales service, and potentially all Sony products, is suspect.
For instance, how many of the readers have had something wrong with their devices, while under warranty, to bring down their gadgets to the service centre, only to be told that the faulty part in question is not under the warranty blanket?
It seems that if the Service Centre can get away with it, they will try to push everything that needs replacing FOC under this heading, so as to maximise their profits by reducing their outlay to the minimum. So parts and services that can be classified as Not covered, will be pushed as such. It looks whittish and cannot stick anymore. Anyone who uses screen protectors on their devices will know what I am talking about.
Here's a case in point.
My Sony Xperia Z, bought from Singtel under a 2 year contract, had a flayed edge to the screen.
But this is different. Apparently this is the LAMINATED film covering the screen of the Xperia phone itself. It's sticks to the screen very securely, and has the Sony Logo printed on it. But my mistake was that since the edge is flayed, and it looked like a screen protector, I brought it down to a Handphone shop a friend owns, to have the 'screen protector' replaces. I showed the phone to my friend who insists that Sony Xperia Z set does not need a screen protector, so I showed him the screen of my phone. He was speechless when he saw the flayed edge. So he also started to believe that the Singtel shop had added a screen protector to the phone.
But when the technician of the shop tried to take the 'screen protector' off, he realised from the resistence, that it was indeed a laminated screen, not a screen protector.
So I brought it down to the Service Centre at Bishan. They told me that it was not covered under the Warranty and quoted me a price of $700 to replace that laminated film. I told him that it had flayed, thereby it should be classified as a defect and should be replaced FOC.
They the took a picture of the screen to send to SONY Singapore for advice. And I went back to await their reply. 3 days later, I had an email acknowleging my problem and that they would get back to me.
A month later, I went back to the Service Centre. They told me that the photo they took earlier wasn't clear and took another photo. I asked the technician how long before they can contact me. They said I should receive a reply in about 3-4 days. So, again, I went home to await the email from the service centre/Sony.
3 weeks later, I again went down to the Service Centre. This time, they said that the film is still not covered under the Warranty, but they offered to replace it for me for $300. I was getting pretty pieved. So I asked them what would happen if I removed the film altoghere, with an aim to replace it with a screen protector(the flaying edge was getting unsightly). They told me that it would not affect the device per se, HOWEVER, (and this part really gets my goat), by removing the film, I would void the warranty for parts for the device. I don't understand, if it is not covered under the warranty in the first place, why would removing it void my warranty?
Clearly, there are problems with SONY's warranty coverage. If you think this is an isolated case, I suggest that if you own a Sony device, look carefully at the screen's edge. You might find that there is a film over the entire screen, and what happend to my phone, could also happen to your device. Afterall, it's used to incorporate the Sony logo. It also acts to protect the screen from casual knocks and scratches. So it's part of the screen. Why it's not covered under the Warranty I will never understand. And that is why I will NEVER buy another Sony product again for the forseeable future.