Unfortunately, the market is rewarding those companies that engage in massive restructuring and retrenchment exercises. After news of restructuring, companies' shares usually react positively.
My concern is with these individuals who live in their ivory towers, preaching about upskilling, etc. It is obvious that this is not the case, as most individuals are not losing their jobs due to irrelevant skills but rather because they are made redundant due to restructuring. The interviewees are all young, in my opinion, fresh graduates.
What is concerning is that for SNEF, they are supposed to be on the side of employees. However, the SNEF executive director is suggesting not to include retrenchment benefits in the contract/law, stating that it would negatively impact the employees as more employee will be impacted because the company is experiencing financial difficulty. While I understand the need to consider various perspectives, it is important to explore all options carefully to ensure fair treatment of employees. I was appalled by this statement. How can we have someone like that representing us from his ivory tower? What is the purpose of cushion benefits? Has this executive director ever encountered retrenchment, has he ever worked in private sector?