a562140
Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2004
- Messages
- 6,412
- Reaction score
- 3
Laurent Farrier and Roger Smith would like to defer. Not always is everything about "atas-ness" nor the need to flaunt.
Rolex's control and dedication to their entire manufacturing process is nothing short of magnificent, to the extent of having their own in-house foundry to control the quality and purity of the metals utilised. Such an incredible feat, possibly enough to render one speechless once the immense magnitude and intricacy of the supply chain is realised. IMO only second to Seiko's legendary effort to R&D and produce the movement lub in-house!
Alas, what was once first and foremost a professional tool has now become a rather "gauche" piece of jewellery given consumer sentiment.
the two ideas can co exist. rolex cost of production is very low because of extreme standardization of parts and the relatively high volume that they sell compared to premium watchmakers. and while they used to be the pioneers and the biggest spenders in advertising, they still are one of the biggest advertised/sponsored watch brand today.
. Not always is everything about "atas-ness" nor the need to flaunt.
