Ok

Some comments from my side:
- they don't understand how many speeds XM2 has
- they use for test standard HEPA
http://item.mi.com/1161000003.html not more expensive HEPA+carbon filter
http://item.mi.com/1153300008.html
- they use wrong filter cost 199 instead regular 149/169 Y
Your pass
1. The more expensive Xiaomi green filter has an additional separate AC layer, instead of the cheaper blue filter which i believe is AC impregnated.
The HEPA filter media is probably in the same ballpark really, bro Asakura was the last person who did some measurements with his laser particle counter at the outlet (actual particle count would be nice though).
Edit - ok, they measured it to be 96.22% efficient @ 0.3 microns.
But they have never measured the green version in other reviews.
2. The Xiaomi Air Purifier ver 2 uses the blue (cheaper) filter.
Of course the 2015 standards test the Formaldehyde removal rate as well (which would also impact the removal rate like TVOCs as well, though the relationship is not directly comparable).
So if one is concerned, just get the green filter from the stores (still have not seen it in the physical NTUC supermarkets here though)
The price is RMB149 for the blue filter and RMB169 for the green filter.
This is the official Xiaomi web store in which quite a lot of us forward our China stuff from nowadays.
https://world.tmall.com/item/442604...32&scm=1007.12559.23637.100200300000000&pos=1
They have given their own reports of the products, which we can of course read. But the most important piece of information/data is really this i guess. Armed with this, readers can go ahead and choose wrt to their own requirements and budget.
Minimum air fan speed CADR, that's probably the night mode?
I only played with the Xiaomi 2 very briefly to check against my 2 of my APs (Samsung AX40 and Mfresh M8088A). I believe the Phone app UI does not show settings for selecting the fan speed, but rather you slide a slider with markings set as m2 area, so i guess that's why they left out the fan speed data in here
As for noise, they said that a 45dB level would affect us different as a waveform bias towards lower or higher frequencies would affect us differently. So they created a "point system" in the 2015 standard - “风速档位合理性” = airflow speed setting reasonable-ness (direct translation)
They deleted the 2014 standard.
在2014年年度空气净化器横评中,我们引入了一个概念,叫“最佳噪音风速档位”,在今年的横评中,我们取消了这个概念,换用了另一个概念“风速档位合理性”。主要原因有两个:
①:最佳噪音风速档位存在一定不合理性,45分贝在低频和高频下对人耳的刺激是不同的,即使同一款产品,不同用户对产品噪音的敏感性也是不同的,因此每个人的“最佳噪音”的是不同的。
②:问题①的存在让我们意识到,很难用一个噪音值来限定最佳噪音,同时我们也发现这种概念无法判断因为档位差所造成的问题。加之今年有LIFAair、EraClean两款“无极变速”产品的加入,我们采用了新的概念“风速档位设定合理性”。
2 products, the LIFAair and Eraclean, have infinitely variable fan speed setting.